Guide 3 · structures compared

Captive, guaranteed cost, retro or large deductible: who carries the bad year?

Every way of insuring a business answers the same question differently: when losses come in above or below expectations, who pays the difference? Here are the four structures the captive design tool compares, and how each one moves with your losses.

Four structures, four answers

The difference between them is not the expected cost alone. It is who carries the variation around it.

1 of 4

Guaranteed cost

A fixed premium. The insurer keeps the profit in a good year and absorbs the loss in a bad one. Your record still matters, but only through experience rating at renewal.

Simplest, and the benchmark the others are measured against.

2 of 4

Retrospective plan

The premium is recalculated after the year from your actual losses, within a minimum and a maximum agreed in advance12. A good year costs less; a bad year costs more, up to the cap.

You share the swing with the insurer, inside a corridor.

3 of 4

Large deductible

You pay each claim up to the deductible yourself and the insurer pays above it, for a lower premium. Insurers commonly hold collateral against the deductibles you owe, and states regulate it; Illinois is one example3.

In Illinois, workers’ compensation deductibles from insurers rated below A- with under $200 million of surplus are capped at 20% of the policyholder’s audited net worth4.

4 of 4

Captive

Your own insurance company keeps the losses up to its retention, buys reinsurance above, and holds capital for the bad years. It keeps the underwriting result, good or bad.

More control and more of your own data; also more capital, running cost and governance.

See it move

How bad was the year? Drag to find out what each plan costs.

guaranteed costretro maximumretro minimum$0 losses2× expected
$1.00M
guaranteed cost premium
$934K
retrospective premium
−$66K
saved against guaranteed cost this year
retro premium = (basic premium + LCF × losses) × tax multiplier, kept between the minimum and the maximum1
basic 0.145 · LCF 1.12 · tax multiplier 1.07 · minimum 0.60 · maximum 1.30 × standard premium2

Illustration: standard premium $1,000,000 and expected losses $650,000 are round, illustrative figures; the basic premium factor (0.145), loss conversion factor, tax multiplier, minimum and maximum are the worked-example values in New York’s published retro manual2. Real plans are negotiated case by case.

Where a captive fits in

A retrospective plan or large deductible already shares your losses with you, without forming a company. A captive goes further: it keeps the underwriting result, earns investment income on reserves, and can fund your own loss-control programmes. In return it needs capital, a licence, a fronting arrangement for some lines5, and annual governance. The right answer depends on your premium, your loss record and your appetite for variation.

The tool compares all four on your numbers

Realtech’s captive design tool prices guaranteed cost, a retrospective plan, a large deductible and a captive on the same basis for your stores, and shows which one is cheapest and how much each would swing in a bad year.

Sources

Figures are published rules, estimates and benchmarks, not quotes. They vary by state, domicile, line of cover and year.

  1. New York Compensation Insurance Rating Board, Retrospective Rating Plan Manual, elements of the plan formula: retrospective premium = (basic premium + converted losses) × tax multiplier, between a minimum and a maximum; the loss conversion factor is negotiated. nycirb.org Rating bureau.
  2. New York Compensation Insurance Rating Board, Retrospective Rating Plan Manual, worked examples (basic premium factor 0.145, maximum 1.30, minimum 0.60, LCF 1.120, tax multiplier 1.070). nycirb.org Rating bureau; illustrative values.
  3. 50 Ill. Adm. Code 2909.40: insurers rated below A- with under $200 million of surplus must require full collateral for workers’ compensation large-deductible obligations. ilga.gov Regulation.
  4. 50 Ill. Adm. Code 2909.50: for those insurers, a per-occurrence workers’ compensation deductible no more than 20% of audited net worth. ilga.gov Regulation.
  5. IRMI glossary, “fronting”: fees generally 5–10% of premium; fronting satisfies financial-responsibility laws such as workers’ compensation and auto, and contract requirements such as leases. irmi.com Industry reference.

This guide is general information about captive insurance. It is not insurance, legal or tax advice. Realtech is an independent consultancy and does not sell insurance.